Free chapter · Legendary Biographies No. 239
from The Valuations, a biography of Andrew Jackson
Chapter 1The Scar
by Theodore Pemberton · 4,667 words · about 19 minutes
Foreword
The first thing I learned as a reporter, and the last thing I would give up, is that governments lie in their statements and tell the truth in their invoices.
I learned it in a basement in Moscow, going through requisition orders for a story about something else entirely. I relearned it in Bosnia, where the mass graves were found by following fuel dockets for the earth-moving equipment: nobody signed anything admitting what the excavators were for, but somebody had to account for the diesel. In Ukraine I watched the same principle operate in the present tense. A press office will deny an operation for as long as you like. A quartermaster cannot deny it, because a quartermaster has to be reimbursed.
So when I came to Andrew Jackson, I came at him from the accounts.
That was not the plan. The plan was a political biography of the man who invented the American presidency as we now have it, and I want to say at the outset that the plan produced a real book and that the man deserves it. Andrew Jackson destroyed the congressional caucus that had chosen presidents behind closed doors since 1800. He established the proposition, which no one had established before him and no one has dislodged since, that the President holds a commission directly from the people. He demanded, over eight years, that the electoral college be abolished. And in July of 1832 he put his name to the most powerful statement against oligarchy any American president has issued, an argument that the law must not manufacture advantage on top of the advantages the world has already distributed. I did not expect to admire that document. I do.
But somewhere in the second year of the work I stopped being able to read anything else, because I had found the valuation books.
In the summer and autumn of 1836, agents of the United States government walked through the Cherokee Nation with notebooks. They were local men, paid four dollars a day. They went house to house and they wrote down what they found. The dimensions of the dwelling. Whether the roof was shingled or the floor planked, because those were worth an extra half-dollar. The chimney, stone or brick or mud. Kitchens, spring houses, smoke houses, loom houses, blacksmith shops, stables, fish traps, hen houses, fenced lots, mills and ferries. The acreage cleared, at three dollars an acre for good ground. And the orchards, tree by tree: apple and peach, counted individually, at eighty cents for a good peach tree.
Sixteen thousand people appear in that record, by name, with their property priced in dollars and cents to the half-cent.
Then those same people were put into stockades in the summer of 1838, and about a quarter of them died, and there is no list of the dead. Not an incomplete list. None. The United States did not compile one, was not required to compile one, and did not notice the omission at the time or afterwards.
That is the book. Everything else in it is scaffolding around that one fact.
I want to be careful here, because there is a lazy version of this argument and I have tried very hard not to write it. The lazy version says that the man was a monster and the democracy was a fraud. The record does not support it. It was not a fraud; his enlargement of the franchise was real, and the men who benefited from it knew that it was real, and six hundred thousand of them voted for him in 1828 having been told in considerable and largely accurate detail what he had done with power when he had it. That is the part that should keep an American awake. He did not deceive the electorate about himself. He was elected by an electorate that had been informed.
Nor is it true that the removals happened while everyone was distracted. I went into the dates expecting to find negligence and found administration. The removal bill was recommended in a message, driven through a hostile House by the President working members one at a time, signed, and converted into a Choctaw cession before the year was out, all of it during the same season in which his cabinet had stopped functioning over a dispute about a social call. Nothing slipped past anybody. The two things ran on separate tracks in the same building, and the removal track ran on time.
What connects them is not hypocrisy. It is a premise, and the premise is the argument of this book. Authority, on Jackson's understanding, rises out of a majority; the President is the officer through whom that majority speaks; and people who are barred from the tally are therefore not underweighted in the reckoning but absent from it. That single idea is what makes the Bank veto magnificent and the removal message chilling. The two documents are nineteen months apart, from the same hand, in the same room, and they agree with each other perfectly.
Two things about the method of this book.
The first is that I have tried to keep faith with the invoices. Where a figure rests on a document I have said which document. Where it rests on somebody's recollection thirty years afterwards I have said so and given the year. Several of the most famous sentences in the Jackson literature turn out to be nineteenth- and twentieth-century inventions, and I have named them as inventions even where, as with Thomas Hart Benton's joke about the bullet, the fake is better than anything true. There is a coffin invoice in circulation with numbers on it so terrible that a book making my argument would want it to be genuine. I could not establish that it is genuine, and Chapter Nineteen explains why I have left it out. A book about the difference between what a government records and what it does not is not entitled to be careless about its own sources.
The second is that I have not put the two columns into a single ledger and struck a balance, because the arithmetic does not work and pretending otherwise is a way of not looking. Both columns are load-bearing. Both are his. Neither is a performance put on over the other. And the reason his face has outlasted a century of argument about it is that each generation has been able to find the column it came for and close the book there.
I would ask you to read both.
Vivian Ashcombe London, July 2026
Chapter 1 · The Scar
The Waxhaws, 1767–1784
Two stone markers stand about three miles apart in the broken red country where the Carolinas meet, and each of them says that Andrew Jackson was born there.
The one on the North Carolina side went up in 1911, replacing a temporary iron marker the Daughters of the American Revolution had set six years earlier, and its base is built out of boulders taken from what local people took to be the chimney foundation of a vanished cabin belonging to a man named George McKemey, or McCamie, or McKamie; the spelling moves around in the records the way the man's house has moved around in the argument. The one on the South Carolina side went up in November 1928, and it carries a more confident inscription, because South Carolina has always had the better single piece of evidence. Today you can only reach the North Carolina marker by driving through South Carolina to get to it. It sits a little over four hundred yards from the state line.
The line is the whole problem. It did not exist in 1767. Surveyors did not run it through that stretch of country until 1772, five years after the birth in question, and when they finally ran it, it fell between the two houses, leaving the McKemey place four hundred and seven yards inside North Carolina and the farm of James Crawford a few hundred yards inside South Carolina. Both families were Jackson's family. Elizabeth Hutchinson Jackson had three sisters in that settlement, and she was moving between two of their houses, on foot or in a cart, heavily pregnant and three weeks a widow, when the child was born. North Carolina says she stopped at her sister Margaret's, at the McKemeys'. South Carolina says she made it to her sister Jane's, at the Crawfords'.
South Carolina's evidence is Jackson himself. In a letter written in August of 1824, when he was fifty-seven years old and running for president, he set down that he had been born at the plantation of his uncle James Crawford, in South Carolina, and he said it again later, in years when South Carolina and the federal government were at each other's throats and it did him no harm at all to be a South Carolinian. North Carolina's evidence is testimony of a different kind: the recollection of a woman named Sarah Lathen, whose mother was said to have been the midwife in the room, and a body of local memory that hardened in the decades after the boy from the Waxhaws became famous. Historians have picked at both. One of the more careful ones noted that no one has ever established that there was a McKemey house standing on that spot in 1767 at all.
It is tempting to treat all this as a curiosity, the sort of thing that goes in a footnote or gets a laugh from a tour guide. It is not a curiosity. It is the first fact about him, and it sets the terms for everything that follows, so it is worth being exact about what it means. The earliest surviving document in the life of Andrew Jackson that fixes where his life began is a claim Andrew Jackson made about Andrew Jackson, in his own hand, at the age of fifty-seven, in a year when the claim was useful to him.
Almost everything in this chapter is like that. The sword cut, the boots, the officer, the dying brother on the horse, the mother's last advice, the scenes that every schoolchild in America once knew, the scenes that put a Jackson on the currency, come to us through memory, most of it collected in the eighteen-fifties by a journalist named James Parton, who went down to the Waxhaws and found old people willing to tell him what they remembered about a boy they had known seventy years earlier, after that boy had become the most divisive man in the republic. Parton was honest about what he had. Some of what he wrote down is corroborated. Much of it is not, and some of it contradicts itself: the sources cannot agree whether the blade caught Jackson's hand or his forearm, his forehead or his scalp, whether there was one horse on the road home or two, whether he walked forty miles or forty-five.
So this book will do the thing that Jackson's biographers have not always done, and it will do it out loud. Where there is a document, it will say so. Where there is only his own account, it will say that too, and it will let the reader hear the difference. This is not a technicality and it is not skepticism for its own sake. The man who ended up signing away twenty-five million acres of other people's country was a man who had learned, very early and very thoroughly, that the story of what had happened was itself a kind of property, that it could be held, improved, defended, and made to pay.
He held this one for seventy-eight years.
Begin, then, with the ground, because the ground is the only witness that cannot be interviewed.
The Waxhaws in 1767 was not a town. There was no courthouse, no market square, no jail; there was a Presbyterian meeting house, a store or two, and a scatter of farms on the creeks that run into the Catawba River, in the rolling upland where the piedmont starts to break. The soil is a heavy red clay that holds water badly and holds a grudge well. Nobody there was rich. The families were Scots-Irish, Presbyterian, and clannish, and they had come down the wagon road from Pennsylvania or up from Charleston in the two decades before Jackson's birth, filling in a country that the colonial governments in Charleston and New Bern regarded as remote, ungoverned, and someone else's problem.
The settlement took its name from the Waxhaw people. They were not there.
They had been there. In 1715 the Waxhaws joined the great pan-tribal rising that the English called the Yamasee War, and they did not survive it as a nation; the survivors were absorbed into the Catawba, and what remained of them in the country was a name and the phrase the surveyors used for their abandoned cornfields, old fields, the best land in the district, cleared and worked and left. Scots-Irish farmers were raising wheat on it within a generation. The place where Andrew Jackson was born was named after a people who had been erased from it fifty years before he arrived, and everyone in the settlement, including his mother, called it by their name without remark.
Nine miles or so away, the Catawba were still there, and their situation in the year of Jackson's birth is worth stating in numbers.
Smallpox came through the Catawba towns in 1759, the fourth time in a century, and by 1760 there were fewer than a thousand of them left. In July of 1760, their leader, the English called him King Hagler, a title the English had invented and given him, negotiated at Pine Tree Hill for what he could still get, and what he could still get was a reservation fifteen miles square: one hundred and forty-four thousand acres, two hundred and twenty-five square miles, straddling the unsurveyed line between the two Carolinas. The bargain was confirmed at the great congress at Augusta on the fifth of November, 1763, three years and four months before Jackson was born. Hagler was already dead by then, ambushed by Shawnees on the road to Catawba Old Town in August, shot six times and scalped.
Settlers were on the reservation before the Revolution began. The Catawba leased to them, because leasing was the only revenue left, and because the alternative to a tenant was a squatter. By the eighteen-twenties the Catawba were down to about a square mile of the hundred and forty-four thousand acres. In 1840, the state of South Carolina, not the United States, which under federal law since 1790 had been the only party that could extinguish Indian title, a detail that will matter enormously in this book some sixty years of American history from now, took the rest of it by a treaty of its own making at Nation Ford, in exchange for a tract in North Carolina that was never bought. In 1847 the governor of South Carolina pronounced the Catawba dissolved as a tribe, and Congress appropriated money the following year, and again in 1854, to try to remove what was left of them west of the Mississippi.
Andrew Jackson was born on the outer edge of that reservation, in a settlement carrying the name of a nation that no longer existed, among a people who had themselves been moved twice, Scotland to Ulster, Ulster to America, and who understood land as the only thing on earth that would hold value, because it was the only thing any of them had ever managed to get.
No adjectives are required here. It is simply where he started.
His father and mother came over from Carrickfergus, in County Antrim, in 1765, with two small sons: Hugh, born about 1763, and Robert, a year or so behind him. They took up two hundred acres on Twelve Mile Creek, upland, thin, the kind of tract available to people arriving late without money. Andrew Jackson the elder worked it for two years and died in the early spring of 1767, at twenty-nine. The tradition in the Waxhaws was that he had ruptured something lifting a log. The tradition also holds that the neighbors drank hard at his wake and nearly lost the coffin off the sled on the way to the burying ground, which may be true and is certainly the kind of story that country tells about itself.
The widow did not inherit a farm; she inherited a position. She sold up and moved in with her sister Jane, whose husband, James Crawford, had a better place and an invalid wife, and Elizabeth Jackson entered that household as unpaid help with three children in tow. That is where her third son grew up: not in poverty, exactly, the Crawfords had land and slaves and a standing in the settlement, but as a dependent in another man's house, a boy whose bed and bread came by the courtesy of an uncle, and who could be reminded of it. For most temperaments that produces caution. For his, it produced something else.
What the old people told Parton, seventy years on, was consistent on the character if on nothing else. He was tall for his age and thin as a rail, freckled, sandy-haired, with pale blue eyes that people remembered. He was profane, which in a Presbyterian settlement was a career choice. He was fast to take offense and faster to answer it, and he had a habit, dogs' fights, cocks' fights, other boys' fights, of being at the center of any trouble available. One of the men he had wrestled as a boy put it in a sentence that has outlived him: he could throw Andrew three times in four, but Andrew "would never stay throwed."
He was thirteen years old when the war came into the settlement, and it did not come in the form of a debate about representation.
Charleston surrendered to the British on the twelfth of May, 1780. Seventeen days later, at three in the afternoon on the twenty-ninth of May, Lieutenant Colonel Banastre Tarleton's British Legion caught a column of Virginia Continentals under Abraham Buford a few miles from the Waxhaw meeting house. The fighting lasted under fifteen minutes.
The numbers come from Tarleton's own report, which is worth remembering when reading them. One hundred and thirteen Americans killed. One hundred and fifty wounded so badly they could not be carried off, and were left where they lay. Fifty-three taken prisoner. On Tarleton's side, five dead and a dozen wounded. Whether the white flag went up and was ignored has been argued for two hundred and forty years; Tarleton's own account concedes that his men, believing him killed, went at the business with a vindictiveness he could not restrain. An officer who walked the field afterward reckoned the wounded were carrying an average of sixteen saber and bayonet wounds apiece; the estimate reaches us at second hand, through Alexander Garden, who does not name him.
The settlement buried eighty-four men in a pit that afternoon and twenty-five more the next day in a second pit three hundred yards from the first. The wounded who could stand a cart were hauled to the Waxhaw Presbyterian meeting house, and people came in from all over the district to work on them, because there was nobody else to do it. The received account, Parton's account, and everyone's since, is that among them were the widow Elizabeth Jackson and her two surviving boys.
Treat that carefully. It is memory, gathered eighty years later, about a woman who was already dead when the war ended and who had become, by the time anyone wrote it down, the mother of a president. But something happened in that building, because of what the boy did next. He went to the militia drill field, and by the sixth of August, thirteen years old, he was at Hanging Rock as a courier, on ground Davie's corps was fighting over, carrying messages while men were shot in front of him.
By then his eldest brother was already dead. Hugh Jackson had gone out with the militia and died in the days after the fight at Stono Ferry, in June of 1779, of heat and exhaustion. He was about sixteen.
And this is the part of the Waxhaws education that matters most, and that the patriotic version cannot hold. The war in that country was not an army against an army. It was neighbors. Houses were burned by men whose names you knew, whose fathers you knew, who worshipped in the building where the wounded had been laid out; Whig and Tory raiding parties took horses, cattle and lives off farms three miles from their own, and there was no court to go to, no sheriff to send for, no garrison over the hill. The state, in the Waxhaws, between 1780 and 1782, simply was not there.
A thirteen-year-old learns from that. What he learns is that no authority is coming; that safety is not something conferred on you but something you take and hold; and that the law is whatever armed men in your own neighborhood have most recently decided it is. Jackson never unlearned it. Forty years later, in Florida, he would hang two British subjects on his own authority in another country's territory, and the surprising thing about it, the thing that ought to be surprising and never is, is that he seems genuinely not to have understood what the fuss was about.
In April of 1781, a Tory neighbor told the dragoons where the boys were.
They were taken at the Crawford house. The story, in the form it has been told for two centuries, is short: a British officer ordered Andrew to clean his boots; Andrew answered that he was a prisoner of war and expected to be treated as one; the officer swung his saber at the boy's head, and the boy threw up his left arm and caught it. He carried the marks on his hand and his head for the rest of his life. Robert refused the same order and was struck too, worse, on the skull.
They were marched forty miles to the British post at Camden and put in with something like two hundred and fifty other prisoners, in a stockade with no beds, little food and no interest whatever in their wounds. Smallpox was in the place. Both boys took it.
Here is what is documented, and it is worth pausing on, because it tells you more about him than the boots do.
Jackson wrote an account of his imprisonment. He wrote it decades afterward, and what he described was not the officer, not the saber, not the smallpox, and not his brother. He described the ground. He set down that in April of 1781 he was confined in the Camden jail, inside the British redoubt nearest Hobkirk's Hill, and he described General Greene's army coming up and encamping on that hill, and how the thing was laid out. The biographers add the detail that he worked a pine knot out of a board in the wall to watch the battle through the hole.
A fourteen-year-old in a smallpox jail with a sword cut in his skull, and what he chose to write down for posterity was a professional assessment of a deployment.
He never told the story of the boots. Other people told it for him, for sixty years, in campaign biographies and stump speeches and children's readers, and he never once corrected them.
His mother got them out. She went to Camden and argued her sons into a prisoner exchange, and she brought them home, Robert on the horse because Robert could no longer sit up without it, Andrew walking behind through rain that came down the last two hours. Robert died within two days of reaching the Waxhaws. Andrew went out of his head with the pox and came back from it slowly, with his mother nursing him.
In the autumn she went to Charleston, a hundred and sixty miles, with several other women of the settlement, to get aboard the British prison ships in the harbor where two of her nephews were being held. Cornwallis surrendered at Yorktown on the nineteenth of October. Somewhere in the second half of that year, and the month has never been fixed, Elizabeth Hutchinson Jackson died of what the sources variously call cholera, plague, yellow fever and smallpox, and what was most likely the ship fever, typhus, that was killing the men she had gone to nurse. She was buried outside Charleston in an unmarked grave. Nobody recorded where. Her clothes and her few things were sent back up the road in a bundle to her surviving son.
He was fourteen years and eight months old. In twenty-nine months he had lost a brother to the sun at Stono Ferry, a brother to smallpox on a road, and a mother to a plague ship in Charleston harbor; the father he had never met was already in the ground at the meeting house. He was, by the standards of the settlement, provided for, there were uncles, there was work, there was a legacy coming from Ireland, and he was, by any other standard, alone in a way that is difficult to overstate. There was no one left alive who had known him as a child.
Fifty years on there would be a monument to his mother in a Charleston park. Her grave has never been found. This is the second time in fourteen years that the record of his life fails at exactly the point where you want it most: nobody can say for certain where he was born, and nobody can say at all where she was buried.
It would be very easy, from here, to make the sword cut do the work of the rest of the book. The scar is right there; it is visible in the portraits if you know to look; and the causal line practically draws itself, orphan, Redcoats, humiliation, hatred, a lifetime of answering every slight with everything he had.
Resist it, because it does not hold. The Waxhaws produced dozens of boys with dead brothers and burned-out farms and reasons to hate the British. Most of them farmed. One of them became a major general who took some twenty-two million acres at Fort Jackson from people who had fought beside him, a president who signed seventy removal treaties, and the face on the twenty-dollar bill. The childhood is not the explanation. It is the beginning of the account, and the entries on the other side of the ledger, which will run to about fifty thousand deported human beings under his presidency alone, are not going to be paid for by anything in this chapter.
What the Waxhaws gave him was narrower than a motive and more useful than one. It gave him the certainty that the world would come at him personally and that no one would arrive to help. It gave him a set of instincts about violence, that it was quick, that it settled things, that it was administered by whoever was willing to administer it first. It gave him the conviction, correct in his experience, that a man's account of events was his to shape. And it gave him one enormous economic lesson, which he learned in a settlement where the only wealth was land, on the lease-rotted edge of a nation that was being squeezed off the map a hundred and forty-four thousand acres at a time: that land was the thing, that it was finite, and that in America it did not have to be bought from the people standing on it.
He left the Waxhaws for good a few years later, and he never came back to live. He kept the scars, the story, and the lesson.
The two markers are still there, three miles apart, in two different states, each of them certain.